Be Notified of New Postings
-
Recent Posts
Law Reform Network
Recent Forum Posts
-
-
-
The template for Microsoft OneNote at looks very u...
By LegalEagle, 2 years ago
-
Recent Comments
Categories
Archives
Meta
Author Archives: admin
What’s wrong with Taliaferro v. Hoogs?
[First published Nov. 10, 2013 – 231 views] What’s wrong with Taliaferro? Taliaferro v. Hoogs (1965) 236 Cal.App.2d 521 is an appellate court opinion widely cited for upholding the constitutionality (of the original version) of California’s so-called “Vexatious Litigants” statute … Continue reading
How vague is “frivolous”? – Part 1
[First published Feb 20, 2014 – republished Dec 8, 2014 after 629 views] How vague is “frivolous”? – Part 1 In 1995 – in the Los Angeles County probate court – in the course of a proceeding for petition for … Continue reading
Posted in Vexatious Litigant Statutes
Leave a comment
Equal Protection Errors in Wolfgram v. Wells Fargo
[First published Dec 12, 2013 – republished Dec 7, 2014 after 593 views] Equal Protection Error in Wolfgram v. Wells Fargo Wolfgram v Wells Fargo Bank (1997) 53 Cal.App.4th 43, is often cited as authority for upholding the constitutionality of … Continue reading
Posted in Vexatious Litigant Statutes
Leave a comment
Equal Protection Error in Wolfe v. George
[First published Dec 10, 2013 – republished Dec 8, 2014 after 261 views] Equal Protection Error in Wolfe v. George Under our Constitutional Equal Protection doctrine, all persons, or classes of persons, shall be treated equally “in the same place … Continue reading
Scottish “Not Proven” Verdict & Zimmerman trial
“Not proven is a verdict available to a court in Scotland. . . .. Under Scots law, a criminal trial may end in one of three verdicts: one of conviction (“guilty”) and two of acquittal (“not proven” and “not guilty”). … Continue reading
Posted in Criminal Law
Leave a comment
Life in Prison for Stealing Tube Socks
Video Description Rolling Stone’s Matt Taibbi on his new article on California’s three-strike rule. http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/2276178587001/life-in-prison-for-stealing-tube-socks/?intcmp=sem_outloud#sp=show-clips
Lawyers’ Fees
The following copies of email messages are self explanatory: Thank you for responding to my email message. Although I am not a lawyer (or rather I should say BECAUSE I am not a lawyer) I have a strong personal interest … Continue reading
Posted in Lawyers' Fees
Leave a comment
Solomonic Procedure: Repeat Litigants’ Facts & Arguments
Solomonic Procedure: A Suggestion for Reform of Litigation Procedure Suggestion: Judges should be required to repeat each litigant’s facts and arguments before giving a decision.
Posted in Litigation Procedure
Leave a comment
From LA Co. Law Library database re Pro Se litigants
The following sources regarding pro se litigation are from the librarian at LA Co Law Library as of Feb. 28, 2013….
Posted in Pro Se Litigation
Leave a comment
Journal Articles of interest to pro se litigants
Articles of interest to pro se litigants are the following: The attached 2009 University of Richmond Law Review Article.One Judge’s View of Pro Se Litigation Pro Se Litigation_Univ of Richmond LRev Attached is article: THE GROWING CHALLENGE OF PRO SE … Continue reading
Posted in Pro Se Litigation
Leave a comment